RATES CURRENT 8/2026 The wages employers in Pakistan post, role by role See the rates
PAKISTAN GUIDE

Pakistan vs. Bangladesh vs. Vietnam for apparel sourcing: the honest comparison

Updated 8/2026

Choose Bangladesh for high-volume basics where per-unit cost is the whole game. Choose Vietnam when you need documented compliance and trade-agreement access into markets Pakistan and Bangladesh can't reach. Choose Pakistan when your product is denim or knit and cotton-based, where its vertical supply chain and specialty skill actually beat the other two, and only after you have run the current US tariff into your landed cost, because for thin-margin categories that tariff line can erase the advantage before it starts. Here is the math, country by country.

The tariff math, first, because it changes the answer for thin margins

Buyers sourcing from Pakistan currently face a real US tariff cost on Pakistani goods, an average effective rate reported at roughly 24.9% as of 2/2026, confirmed directly against USAFacts' primary tariff-rate page for Pakistan (up from 18.4% for 2025 and 9.6% for 2024). The overall US average rate across all trading partners was 8.5% in that same 2/2026 reading, so Pakistan runs at roughly three times the all-partner average. Run that rate against your actual margin before you run it against anything else: on a thin-margin basic garment, a tariff in that range can turn a lower factory-gate price into a higher landed cost than a country with a better tariff treatment, even before you compare fabric or labor. On a specialty item with real margin room, denim or technical knits where Pakistan's per-unit cost advantage is larger, the same tariff bites less hard proportionally. The category you're sourcing decides whether the tariff line is disqualifying or just a cost to plan around, and a landed-cost comparison across these three countries that doesn't put the current tariff line in front of the fabric-cost line is not a real comparison. Bangladesh and Vietnam carry their own tariff treatments, which are not identical to Pakistan's. Per the same USAFacts tariff-rate series, Bangladesh's average effective US tariff rate is roughly 30.8% and Vietnam's is roughly 11.9%, both as of 2/2026, against the same 8.5% overall US average, so neither country escapes the tariff conversation and Bangladesh's rate is actually higher than Pakistan's.

Volume and price: Bangladesh is the scale leader

Bangladesh built the world's second-largest garment export industry on high-volume basics production, backed by an industry association (BGMEA) that tracks export figures at a national scale few countries match. BGMEA's own export-performance data puts Bangladesh's RMG exports at roughly $39.35 billion for fiscal year 2024-25 (about 81% of the country's total exports that year). That scale is the whole story for a buyer whose priority is the lowest possible per-unit cost on high-volume basic garments (t-shirts, basic knits) at massive order quantities. It is not the story for a buyer who needs specialty fabrics, smaller runs, or faster turnaround on a narrower product line.

Quality and compliance: Vietnam's edge is infrastructure, not just labor

Vietnam has built a reputation for quality consistency backed by real infrastructure: membership in multi-country trade agreements (CPTPP, the EU-Vietnam free trade agreement) that give it tariff advantages into markets Pakistan and Bangladesh don't reach on the same terms, and a compliance and factory-audit ecosystem matured alongside two decades of major Western brands sourcing there. We are not attaching a dollar figure to Vietnam's export volume, because we have not pulled and dated one from VITAS, the Vietnam Textile and Apparel Association. The trade-agreement and infrastructure facts stand on their own.

That trade-agreement asymmetry is worth understanding rather than skimming, because it cuts differently depending on where you sell. Into the EU, Pakistan holds GSP+ preferential access and Bangladesh has benefited from Everything But Arms treatment as a least-developed country, while Vietnam's advantage runs through the EU-Vietnam FTA. Into the US, none of those European arrangements help you at all: your duty is set by the US schedule, which is where Pakistan's 24.9% effective rate bites. A sourcing team that reads "Pakistan has preferential access" from an EU-oriented source and applies it to a US import plan has made an expensive category error. Match the preference program to your destination market before it enters your landed-cost model.

For a buyer prioritizing consistent quality and defensible compliance documentation over the lowest possible unit cost, Vietnam's infrastructure advantage is real and not easily replicated by a country without the same trade-agreement access.

Pakistan's actual case: denim, knits, and cotton proximity

Pakistan's specific strength is in denim and knitwear, industries clustered around Faisalabad (Pakistan's textile and knitwear hub) and Karachi/Lahore for broader apparel manufacturing, backed by domestic cotton production that shortens the raw-material supply chain compared with countries that import cotton before they can spin and weave it. That vertical integration, cotton to yarn to fabric to garment inside one country, is a structural advantage Pakistan holds that neither Bangladesh nor Vietnam can claim in the same way, since both import a meaningfully larger share of their raw cotton.

The US import data shows where that advantage actually lands. In the twelve months through 6/2026 the US imported $1.07 billion of woven apparel and $1.32 billion of knit apparel from Pakistan, plus $1.50 billion of made-up textile articles, a chapter dominated by bed, table, and kitchen linen at just over $1.03 billion on its own. Alongside those, cotton yarn and woven cotton fabric came in at $197 million, which is the vertical chain showing up in the customs data as fabric exports rather than only as finished garments. Full series on the trade flows page.

The honest limit on that advantage: it's specific to denim, knit, and cotton-based garment categories, not a general "Pakistan is better at apparel" claim. A buyer sourcing synthetic-fiber garments or footwear has less reason to default to Pakistan on this basis.

MOQ and lead time: none of the three countries are interchangeable on this

Minimum order quantities and lead times vary by factory and product category in all three countries, and a blanket statement ranking them on MOQ or speed would be exactly the kind of unsourced confident claim this page exists to avoid. We don't yet have our own ground-verified MOQ and lead-time benchmarks for Pakistan, so this comparison stays qualitative until that data exists.

One planning input that does generalize: fabric lead time sits upstream of garment lead time, and buyers routinely forget it. A quoted production window usually starts when fabric is in the factory, not when you approve the sample, and mill lead times for greige and finished fabric commonly run 30 to 45 days before cut-and-sew begins. Pakistan's domestic mill base is what compresses that step relative to a country importing its fabric, which is the practical form the vertical-integration advantage actually takes. Ask any quoted timeline whether it includes fabric procurement or assumes it.

Risk and current conditions: real, country-specific, and worth stating plainly

Each country carries its own risk profile. Pakistan's includes the tariff exposure stated above plus grid and port conditions that vary by industrial zone, factors we track in our own operating-conditions data as it comes online rather than repeating generic country-risk language here. Bangladesh's and Vietnam's comparable risk factors, labor-standard compliance history, port congestion, and similar, would need their own named-source pull (BGMEA, VITAS, or a body like the ILO for labor standards) before we state a specific comparative risk claim; we have not run that pull for this draft, so we are not making one here. Candor about a country's weak points is more useful to a buyer than a sales pitch that omits them, and that applies to Pakistan's own tariff exposure as much as to the other two.

Our call

Run the tariff math for your category before you pick a country on cost or capability alone. And notice what that math does to the conventional answer: Bangladesh carries the higher US tariff rate of the two, roughly 30.8% against Pakistan's 24.9% as of 2/2026, so the country usually recommended for thin-margin basics starts nearly six points behind on duty. Whether Bangladesh's factory-gate price still wins depends entirely on how large that price gap is for your specific garment, and we do not have dated factory-gate quotes for either country to settle it. We are not going to wave the tariff line away with an assertion about volume advantage, which is exactly the move this page opened by warning against. Get quotes from both, add the duty, compare landed. For quality-sensitive categories where compliance documentation and trade-agreement pricing matter more than the lowest unit cost, Vietnam's infrastructure is hard to beat. For denim and cotton-based knits specifically, where Pakistan's vertical cotton-to-garment chain gives it a real per-unit edge, that edge can survive the tariff and still be the better landed cost, which is the case worth running the actual math on before you default to Bangladesh out of habit.

What we don't know yet

The tariff figures above, for all three countries, have been directly reconfirmed against the primary USAFacts pages as of this draft (Pakistan 24.9%, Bangladesh 30.8%, Vietnam 11.9%, all 2/2026). BGMEA's export-performance data is loaded and dated (FY2024-25). Pakistan's US import values are loaded and dated from official US customs data. We still don't have VITAS figures for Vietnam, factory-gate price quotes for any of the three countries, or our own MOQ and lead-time benchmarks, and the Bangladesh/Vietnam comparative risk-factor claim needs its own named-source pull before it states a specific comparison. This page updates once those gaps close.

Sources: USAFacts tariff-rate series (2/2026, all three countries, directly reconfirmed); BGMEA export-performance data; US Census Bureau International Trade API via the SourceGrowth trade-flow dataset (trailing twelve months through 6/2026, pulled 8/2026). Vietnam export figures and comparative risk factors remain unsourced pending further data pulls.

Where to go next

Get matched to the right country

The tariff math and the category fit are specific to your product, not something a general comparison page can settle for you. Talk to our team and we will run your category and margin against the countries that actually fit.

Data status: wages-v0, last pulled 8/2026 CURRENT (refresh cadence: every 31 days)
Public job-posting wage layer (posted salaries only, PKR). Wages are what employers pay locally - not billed outsourcing rates.

See if Pakistan fits what you're building.

The guide above is the market. Our people on the ground turn it into a plan for your team or your product, and tell you straight if the fit is wrong.

Get a straight fit-check